Discussion: Does Aurora Massacre Change Our View of Personal Safety?

A discussion point since 9/11, will the mayhem at the Batman movie make us rethink security at movie theaters, malls or school events? Join the discussion.

12 moviegoers have been reported dead and 50 are wounded in Aurora, Colorado.

One gunman and one crowded theater.

Western Washington woke up Friday morning to live video coming from Aurora, Colo., where James Holmes, a young gunman reportedly wearing a gas mask and a bulletproof vest, opened fire during a midnight showing of Batman: The Dark Knight Rises, a movie expected to gross $200 million this weekend.

Since the Sept. 11 terror attacks of 2001, Americans have been on various levels of alert, but anyone with an ounce of cynicism has recognized that movie theaters, malls and school events—so-called soft targets because they are gathering locations with little security—are ripe for domestic terror or deranged madmen.

The Friday morning massacre at the Century 16 in Aurora took place 19 miles and 13 years from Columbine High, but it’s the kind of tragedy that can open up wounds in every region in America.

Including Washington.

  • The shooting at Cafe Racer in May shook Seattle when four were shot dead and five injured in a random shooting inside the coffee shop. Bellevue resident , a mother of two, was murdered by the gunman in a carjacking just afterward, before he took his own life.
  • In 2006, a gunman hunted down guests at a Capitol Hill late-night house party and fatally shot six people, including teenagers. The incident has been nicknamed the Capitol Hill Massacre. He shot himself as police arrived.
  • In 2005, a deranged gunman walked into the Tacoma Mall and shot over 20 rounds of ammunition into the crowd of shoppers. Six were shot and the shooter held four people hostage but no one was killed.

Nationwide, this is the sixth mass, random shooting of the year. All such events—not just the local ones—remind us of just how vulnerable we are.

And they bring the specter of copycats who think they can do it just a little better—or bigger.  

Do we keep the status quo and prove that we haven’t been beaten, or do we make changes because we want to see next year, want to see our kids get married and our grandkids grow up?

The incident Friday morning is likely to start a discussion—a very real, very serious discussion—about personal safety in public places.

Let's start it here.

Should metal detectors become as standard as popcorn machines at movie theaters? Should there be armed security, or will a thick dude in a yellow jacket be enough to stop someone carrying a gun who wants to get in with or without a ticket? Will there be no more dress-up at the theater, which apparently allowed the Aurora gunman to enter with a handgun, a rifle, a gas canister and a gas mask?

What do you think this morning in light of Aurora, the newest name in tragedy?

You can log in and comment with your free Patch account or your Facebook account. 

Justin July 21, 2012 at 06:37 PM
More people should be trained and armed with firearms.
Vince July 21, 2012 at 07:16 PM
I always carry. I go to the gun range every 2 weeks and got trained at Insight Training. I am not taking any chances. An incident like this can happen and will happen again....we have seen this happen so many times and victims are just helpless- no cops around or anything to defend themselves with. There are lots of crazies running around loose and I dont ever want to be a victim.
Sarah Weinberg July 21, 2012 at 09:51 PM
Let's just think for a moment about what it might have been like in that Aurora, CO theatre if several patrons had whipped out their guns and started shooting when the crazed gunman opened fire. How many more people, in addition to the crazed gunman, would have been killed or severely injured? Do we really want our malls and theatres to become wild shooting sprees? When theatre patrons and mall shoppers become vigilante cops shooting at anyone they think might shoot them (like Zimmerman shooting Trayvon Martin in Florida), we will be in more danger, not less. There will always be mentally deranged people among us, most of whom will never harm anyone, but a few will, if given the opportunity. What we really need is to make it impossible for them to obtain firearms and explosive devices. We also need to make it easier for families to get help for their relative who is mentally ill and insists that he/she doesn't need help. Families ought to be able to prevent their mentally ill loved ones from obtaining any weapons at all.
Suzanne sperry July 22, 2012 at 08:45 PM
Sarah, I totally agree with you. Firearms should be available only to a very few people in dangerous occupations.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »