.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Senior Citizens Will Bear Heavy Burden of Bond Costs

Senior Citizen Claus Jensen writes in a letter to the editor about the impacts the proposed $196 million school bond could have on senior residents, especially those living on a fixed income.

(Ed. Note: This is the second of three letters Mercer Island Patch received over the weekend, March 16-18. from Janet Frohnmayer at 2 p.m. we'll publish a third letter from Cindi Pacecca, a first-grade teacher at Lakeridge Elementary School, at 6 p.m.)

Editor:

As a resident of Mercer Island for the past 32 years - and a retired senior at age 79 - I am extremely concerned about the financial impact of the upcoming $200 Million school bond, scheduled for a vote next month.

Most Senior Citizens are living on a steadily decreasing income, due to the near-zero percent interest policy of the Federal Reserve which has cut annual yields on IRAs and CDs from 5% to minus 2% when inflation is factored in.

Against that background, any major increases in local taxes are bound to jeopardize the financial well being of our fellow Senior Citizens and indeed force many of us to consider whether we can continue to afford to live on Mercer Island.

The projected cost to a homeowner with an assessed valuation of $950,000 will be approximately $3,600 per year for just the school portion of the annual Property Tax. The bond also calls for buying land for a "sixth school," but not the money to build that school, and for designing a master plan for the north campus "mega-block," but not the money for any changes there. Clarity on costs to citizens is critical in our current economic climate. We do not know the cost of other proposals that may come from the City, including a new fire station or moving city hall, or from King County, Sound Transit or others. (ref. Citizens for Rational School Planning at http://www.no-mi-school-tear-down.com/)

I am afraid that many Senior Citizens living on Mercer Island are unaware of the financial sacrifice that they might be forced to make due to the exorbitant cost of the bond. I hope they will join me in voting "NO" on April 17.

Sincerely,

Claus V. Jensen

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mercer Island Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jerry Gropp Architect AIA May 15, 2013 at 02:07 pm
The Jury is still out. I liked the "Old Patch". J
Linda Mammano April 12, 2013 at 10:43 am
That is the best commentary on the subject to date. This should be on the front page of every localRead More newspaper. Finally pressure to bear. Thank you!!!
Thomas Imrich April 10, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Excellent assessments today, both by Mr. Horn here, and by Mr. Cero in today's MI Reporter. The keyRead More is that we need new blood in both the legislature, and in our City Council, to actually better understand the problems at hand and potential real solutions we'll need. Many of our elected and appointed officials are poorly representing their constituency. For example, Ms. Clibborn could readily put the brakes on this I-90 tolling tax diversion to fund 520 fiasco, in a heartbeat, through her leadership position for state transportation. But despite that tolling is a terrible precedent, and could even undermine the entire national interstate highway system, Ms. Clibborn is CHOOSING NOT TO fight I-90 bridge tolling. Apparently she and some of our waffling weak kneed Council members have made their choices about this issue, and about other debacles, like our seriously flawed highly subsidized mass transit, and our pending loss of carpool lanes. Now it is approaching the time to make our decisions, in the next election.
Kevin Scheid April 9, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Great article Jim. So despite the bad decisions and bad policy by the legislature, we can gatherRead More that the way out of this mess is to raise gas tax appropriately to pay for the roads. Additionally I might add, we can scale down on the upgrades and delay constructing the approaches to the 520 bridge. Scaling back these upgrades should not affect the safety or construction schedule of the 520 bridge and may eliminate the funding shortage entirely.