.

City Manager Conrad's Job Performance Under Review Following Lindell Lawsuit Settlement

Mercer Island Councilmembers Mike Cero and Mike Grady pushed for a closed-door Sept. 19 performance review of City Manager Rich Conrad.

Political posturing over the settlement of a involving and two council members came out into the open last week, as plans to review the performance of the city manager behind closed doors were made public at a Sept. 6 City Council meeting.

As the meeting drew to a close, two contrasting approaches were discussed on what action City Council should take after City Hall was forced to into a $1 million settlement with former employee.

Councilman Bruce Bassett asked in a prepared statement for time at City Council's next public meeting on Sept. 19 to vet three bids by legal consultants selected by the City Manager's Office to review the city's administrative "policies, procedures and work climate." 

"With the Lindell lawsuit behind us, I'm not happy about the outcome but I know there's no use crying over spilt milk," Bassett said. "Now's the time to move forward and assure ourselves and the public we'll do everything we can to promote a transparent and healthy government."

In response, Councilmen Mike Cero and Mike Grady requested the council should conclude the matter at the next City Council meeting by holding a review of Conrad's job performance behind closed doors. 

City Manager Rich Conrad dismissed former Deputy City Manager Londi Lindell in 2008, but Lindell fought back with a claiming sex harassment and retaliation in the workplace, naming Conrad, Mayor Jim Pearman and Deputy Mayor El Jahncke — among others — as defendants in the lawsuit. The details of the settlement, , were approved and publicized in mid-July (). 

Bassett also asked City Hall to produce a report on reviewing the city's compliance with the state's Public Records Act and offer a proposal for hiring a city communications officer, with a special emphasis on transparency. The city was , plus attorney's fees, in the lawsuit. A hearing to decide attorney's fees — which could cost the city an additional $180,000 — is scheduled for tomorrow (Sept. 13) at 10 a.m. in U.S. District Court in Seattle before Hon. James L. Robart.

In contrast to seeking outside advice on the matter, Councilmen Cero and Grady sought to narrow the discussion to what they viewed as facts already revealed from the Lindell lawsuit. In an Aug. 25 letter obtained by Mercer Island Patch (click here to see the letter), the councilmen gave several reasons for requesting the meeting, as authorized by state law under RCW 42.30.110 (1)(g).

One of those reasons included their "understanding" that Conrad and Human Resources Director Kryss Segle did not follow proper procedure in handling an employee's use of a publicly-owned computer to view pornographic material.

"The federal litigation did not 'clear the names' of Rich Conrad, Kryss Segle and other staff," wrote Cero and Grady.

They also requested, due to what they called "the sensitive nature of the discussion," that the meeting be held without the participation of Conrad or other City Hall personnel.  

In the 10-minute discussion that followed, Mayor Pearman confirmed that an executive session was scheduled, but sought to include some of Bassett's proposed ideas into the next meeting's agenda. Also scheduled for Sept. 19 is a discussion to repurpose approximately $2 million in general fund savings from the city's sewer lake line replacement project (click here for a document describing uses for the money agreed to at a June city council planning meeting).

"We need to know exactly what's being proposed, what we could potentially take advantage of," said Councilman Dan Grausz. "I want us to go into this with our eyes wide open."

It was unclear from Tuesday's discussion where funding for an outside review would come from.

"We may move some stuff around," Pearman said. "We will make sure you're crisp."

Word of the executive session spread around the Island, prompting to weigh in against meeting behind closed doors on such an important matter. Bertlin has in her campaign to unseat Deputy Mayor Jahncke. As city council mayor and deputy mayor, both Pearman and Jahncke set the agenda for each council meeting.

"Where is the transparency we deserve?" she asked in press release posted on her campaign website. "We’ve had months of silence from our City Council instead. It is time the community hear what is being discussed, who is accountable and what corrective actions will be taken to ensure that the City of Mercer Island does not face similar suits in the future. Anything less is completely unacceptable. Will the City Council ever quit hiding?”

Toby Nixon, president of the open-government advocacy group Washington Coalition for Open Government, said the City Council is not required to hold a performance review behind closed doors — but that does not rule out a contractual agreement between the employer and employee to shield the review from public.

"(State law) does say some things must be done in public," he said. "Final action, including disciplining an employee, must be done in public." 

Jerry Gropp Architect AIA September 13, 2011 at 12:58 AM
I've known a lot of MI City Managers and Rich Conrad is one of the best we've ever had. He's grown to fit a difficult job- with far too many bosses.
Thornton Gale September 13, 2011 at 03:05 PM
Another consultant to review and make recommendations about the city's administrative "policies, procedures and work climate." Are these guys kidding? We already hired and paid for one to study and report on this exact issue in 2007. Marcella Reed, a well known personnel consultant and attorney, was hired to investigate the policies, procedures, and work climate of the city surrounding the activities of city personnel in the Johnny Seagle matter. Marcella Reed wrote a report but just as she was about to deliver her findings to the City Council on 12/3/07 her presentation was abruptly terminated by the City Council. Later we learned that she was going to recommended the dismissal of City Manager Rich Conrad. Instead, a three person "Council Cabinet" consisting of then Mayor Brian Cairns, Councilman Jim Pearman, and Councilman El Jahncke "investigated" the incident in a series of secret meetings and without asking Londi Lindell a single question (some investigation!). Ms. Lindell as well as City Attorney Bob Sterbank were later fired based on their recommendation. So now, Councilman Bassett wants to have yet another investigation on this exact same topic. It is so typical hiding behind a secret investigation during which no councilman will have to answer any questions about the case. "Sorry, I can't answer that - it's under investigation." What do you suppose will happen this time when the council doesn't like the findings.
Charon Gooding September 13, 2011 at 04:47 PM
Thank you Thornton. Where is the transparency here? We all know the answer to your last question "what do you suppose will happen..." Perhaps voting for Bertlin is a step in the right direction. Charon Gooding
john September 25, 2011 at 03:57 PM
Thanks Thornton, you summed it up perfectly. Why do we, the taxpayers have to pay for yet another consultant to come in and deliver the same findings? There is enough supportive evidence from this current investigation (Reed findings) to do a clean sweep through the city offices. A great confidence boost to the taxpayers of Mercer Island would be the dumping of Conrad, Segle and Knight. Collectively they have cost plenty... Can we get a refund?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something