.
Feedback

Letter: Put Extra Money into Fire Equipment Savings Fund

Joy Matsuura writes about her concerns over Mercer Island's city spending priorities.

Editor:

Voters recently passed a fire station/rescue truck levy. Despite misgivings that many have about government spending and the $5M pricetag, the majority of voters felt that supporting the fire department was important enough to endure an increase in taxes.

In (Monday night's) City Council meeting, it was pointed out that passage of the levy means that the City now has an extra $113,000. The money had been intended for repairs to the south fire station, but repairs were no longer needed as the building will soon be torn down.


What to do with the money? Council members briefly discussed options. An idea that seemed to be gaining ground was to use it (or part of it) to reconfigure parts of Mercerdale Park (maybe get rid of the skate park, etc.). An idea that seemed to have very little support was to put the money into the fire equipment savings fund (aka the Sinking Fund).

The Sinking Fund was set up a few years ago and meant to cover the purchase of equipment (like rescue trucks) and other fire-department related expenses. The rescue truck had to be added to the recent levy because there wasn't enough money in the Sinking Fund to cover it. The Sinking Fund didn't have enough money because the City felt that allocating money to other things was more important, so the Sinking Fund was funded only from interest income (which in recent years has been next to nothing).

(Monday) night the Finance Director pointed out that based on current projections, the Sinking Fund will run out of money in 2016. The City Manager assured council that this is not a cause for alarm. 2016 is a long ways away. They don't have to worry about the fund now, it will be "taken care of" later. Perhaps he assumes that home sales will pick up and that if they don't provide enough revenue that the City can just raise the utility taxes or construction permits a little higher.

The City Manager makes $165,933 plus a $6000 bonus--more money than the Governor of Washington or the Mayor of Seattle, That may be why he thinks money is so easy to come by and spends it so freely. He certainly pays his staff well. The Deputy City Manager makes $150,000 and the Director of Human Resources (who oversees two people) makes almost $140,000.

I think the people of Mercer Island would like to see their tax money treated with respect. Blowing it on low-priority items while leaving the Sinking Fund underfunded--yet again--is an insult.

The City Council has not yet decided on the best way to spend their $113,000 windfall. I recommend that voters contact the City Council and suggest that they put ALL of it into the fire equipment Sinking Fund. This way, no matter what the economy does in the next couple years, we hopefully won't have to resort to another levy to give our firefighters the support they need.

--Joy Matsura

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mercer Island Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jerry Gropp Architect AIA May 15, 2013 at 02:07 pm
The Jury is still out. I liked the "Old Patch". J
Linda Mammano April 12, 2013 at 10:43 am
That is the best commentary on the subject to date. This should be on the front page of every localRead More newspaper. Finally pressure to bear. Thank you!!!
Thomas Imrich April 10, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Excellent assessments today, both by Mr. Horn here, and by Mr. Cero in today's MI Reporter. The keyRead More is that we need new blood in both the legislature, and in our City Council, to actually better understand the problems at hand and potential real solutions we'll need. Many of our elected and appointed officials are poorly representing their constituency. For example, Ms. Clibborn could readily put the brakes on this I-90 tolling tax diversion to fund 520 fiasco, in a heartbeat, through her leadership position for state transportation. But despite that tolling is a terrible precedent, and could even undermine the entire national interstate highway system, Ms. Clibborn is CHOOSING NOT TO fight I-90 bridge tolling. Apparently she and some of our waffling weak kneed Council members have made their choices about this issue, and about other debacles, like our seriously flawed highly subsidized mass transit, and our pending loss of carpool lanes. Now it is approaching the time to make our decisions, in the next election.
Kevin Scheid April 9, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Great article Jim. So despite the bad decisions and bad policy by the legislature, we can gatherRead More that the way out of this mess is to raise gas tax appropriately to pay for the roads. Additionally I might add, we can scale down on the upgrades and delay constructing the approaches to the 520 bridge. Scaling back these upgrades should not affect the safety or construction schedule of the 520 bridge and may eliminate the funding shortage entirely.