.

MISD Keeps Public 'In the Loop' on Bond, Land Deal

School board directors say they will support a smaller land deal after the proposed purchase of the Redeemer Lutheran Church property stalled.

officials and school board members announced their intention to keep local voters "in the loop" with the online publication of information about a and updates on a proposed land deal at last Thursday's board meeting.

The MISD released its quarterly edition of the District News newsletter online to satisfy residents too hungry to wait for it's information on the bond to arrive by surface mail (click here to see the newsletter). Officials pledged the information contained would be fact-based and unbiased toward approving or rejecting it (see here for comprehensive school bond coverage on Mercer Island Patch).

Voters will also receive information about the bond issue, how it will appear on the ballot and proponents for and against the measure. Advocacy websites have sprung up on either side — supporters are located at http://mischoolsyes.org/, while those opposed to the bond are located at http://www.no-mi-school-tear-down.com/.

At the Thursday, March 8 meeting at , Superintendent Gary Plano read from a prepared statement titled "Land Acquisition Update", which detailed to buy the and the properties:

"Representatives from Mercer Island School District initiated an inquiry with representatives of Redeemer Lutheran Church about a potential sale to the school district in October of 2011. Since then the District has been in ongoing conversations with the Church and delivered an initial offer to them in late December of 2011. Although the District exchanged information with Church representatives about the potential sale of the property until February, of 2012, it acknowledges the sensitivity of selling Church property, which has been on Mercer Island for over 50 years as reported.

The Superintendent and CFO have made inquires this past week about continuing the on-going dialogue. However, no discussions have taken place. If the Church decides to maintain its present location, the District is committed to completing the purchase of the Stevenson property. Although the Stevenson property is too small to site a school, it does allow for a potential land swap with a property owner at some future time, should the District’s student population require additional classrooms."

Plano also reiterated that the land deal must be completed by August 2013.

School Board President Janet Frohnmayer clarified the board's March 1 decision to publicly annouce the "conversations" around the real estate offer.

"We made a decision to disclose our negotiations with the church, even though the final agreement has not been reached," she said. "And that's because we felt like being transparent and open with the community … And similarly, tonight, we are basically keeping you in the loop about what's going on. We feel it is important for you, the public, to be aware of this process."

Several School Board members also sought to weigh in over why the strategic purchase of land was needed, regardless of whether or not the Redeemer Lutheran Church property was purchased.

"Our intent in pursuing this transition was to be able to create a location where we could put an additional school, in light of the statement you just read, that is in jeopardy at this point," said Director Brian Emanuels. "However, we have a growing student population and an Island that is not growing. We have a long-term need for additional land for schools. Our desire is to proceed with this land acquisition and continue over a long-term, a search for additional land, wherever that may exist on the island. Ideally on the North End of the Island, where we have seen the largest student population growth. The intent of this statement is to say we remain committed to that, it leaves all possibilities open to what we might do in the future. Being able to acquire a very unique parcel of land, that's available now, is a great thing for Mercer Island, for the taxpayers, for the residents. That part of the transaction we are committed to, because it opens up possibilities for us down the road in dealing with expected population growth."

"This was one of the key recommendations of 21 CFPC, was the recognition that we as an Island have been built out," said Frohnmayer. "We as a school district — who in the past have sold land — we have a very restricted inventory of land. And so, it completely reduces our flexibility and ability to respond to changes in student population ... the Stevenson property is really an important step in creating more future possibilities."

President Tani Lindquist spoke during public comment period in favor of the bond, recognizing the impact state budget cuts have had on school and class sizes. Since 2007, the state has cut the MISD budget by approximately $4.2 million. The local teacher's union head said she wished for smaller schools and smaller class sizes, but couldn't envision how it could be paid for.

"In this current economic climate, neither is realistic," she said. "We've repurposed closets in our schools because some of our special education students need break out spaces. (Schools based on) 1950s construction wasn't thinking about autistic kids, wheelchair-disabled kids or those with sensory disorder. The question is, what is the reality here now? I would just love to have a facility that can handle the kids that are here now. I appreciate the board trying to create a realistic vision for us."

Ira Appelman, a frequent critic of elected officials and a self-described open government advocate, disputed accounts of how the school distict had to sell land — specifically land where the and the is located — to sustain programs and low class sizes in the past.

"The board said the land for PEAK was surplus. I don't think anyone there in the audience believed that ... It was obvious to us when we said don't build PEAK there."

Plano later said that the PEAK land was never officially deemed "surplus" and advanced planning for a new high school was taken into consideration when the location of the new Boys and Girls Club was determined.

The School Board will meet again on March 22 at 7 p.m. in the Mercer Island School District Administration building board room.

Kris Kelsay March 15, 2012 at 02:54 PM
The Stevenson's property has turned into a bit of a lightening rod on this bond issue. I'm especially disappointed that the NO campaign is attempting to use the Stevenson's neighbors and Redeemer as a political pawn in their attempt to fail our important school bond. The deceiving propaganda that is being distributed in the surrounding neighborhoods is using doctored public records requested information to distort reality. You can see the documents that are being distributed and the original documents that came from the district here: www.whatifitfails.wordpress.com.
Josh Hagan March 16, 2012 at 06:55 PM
The only reason this bond is "important" is because if passed it would be disastrous. The problem with people from the "Yes" campaign is that they have a horrible plan but will never concede that is the case----Whether through stubbornness, or the fact that their critical faculties were never on par to begin with. The people supporting the bond consistently use idiotic fear mongering to make parents think their children will be reading from mud huts if we don't pass their unorganized and badly planned proposals. The irony of course is that with all the fear mongering, they want you to see everything about their plan with rose colored glasses. We're to assume it will help traffic----even though they've offered no reason why this is the case, other than to take their word for it that it's been planned out (and of course, given the location of where they want the school, it's a ridiculous promise in the first place). To wit, no one has provided a reasonable explanation why Island Park can't just be remodeled. I mean, wouldn't that be something: a plan that doesn't disrupt the entire freaking island and dramatically alter neighborhoods while at the same time improving our schools. No no, that would be too simple. What we need are overzealous suburban white people to make a bunch of promises.
Candace Scarcello Dempsey March 17, 2012 at 03:49 AM
I live in the Stevenson neighborhood. We are not pawns. We are horrified that MISD decided to site a school literally in our backyards without consulting us. The Redeemer/Stevenson parcel is too small even to allow a buffer zone. Since MISD already has a beautiful school at Island Elementary, this is a disastrous mistake and a needless sacrifice. By all means, build a new school at the same site. That would be logical. So would putting an additional school in the north end, where the growth is. There is no need to wreck a beautiful neighborhood and increase traffic congestion. And, please, don't ask us to pay for it. VOTE NO on April 17th. Stop the madness.
Kris Kelsay March 18, 2012 at 06:53 AM
Candace, I asked a school board member a day or two ago how many letters they had received from Stevenson property owners. The answer was zero. Why aren't the neighbors making their wishes to not have a school sited on the property known to the decision makers -- the school board? It's perplexing.
Kris Kelsay March 18, 2012 at 07:06 AM
Josh mentions in his comment, "The only reason this bond is "important" is because if passed it would be disastrous." In my opinion having the bond faii would be disastrous--for our kids and for our property values. If others would like to see the facts behind why the can read more on my personal blog dedicated to the subject: www.whatifitfails.org. I also find it odd that Josh has needed to mention "white people" repeatedly in his comments on Patch. Doesn't seem to be a race issue to me.
Candace Scarcello Dempsey March 18, 2012 at 09:28 AM
Kris, We are a large group of voters whose houses either surround that property or are in the many neighborhoods on Island Crest Way. We were all caught by surprise when the superintendent announced that a new school was to be built on the Stevenson farm/Redeemer Lutheran lots. We are taking appropriate action as a group and the school district has heard from us.
Kris Kelsay March 18, 2012 at 04:46 PM
Candace, I totally understand that you were caught by surprise. We all were! I'm just hoping that we're not "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" on this one. I think your ultimate goal is to keep the school where it is, and it seems to me the easiest way to get what you want is to get just three school board members to agree to rebuild in place. Yet it feels that no one in your neighborhood is talking to them. (I'm hoping that something is coming based upon your email.) The Board has the authority to make that type of decision--before or after the bond vote. I'm guessing they need feedback from you guys to do it. Killing the bond over this item, when a simple solution may be possible just isn't fair to our kids and teachers. Or to the rest of us on the Island that are hoping to see our home values rise as the economy recovers. Please help your group consider the value of working with the district and board on this instead of against them.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something